Cases 21 - 29 of 29
SULLIVAN v. ESPOSITO et al
as 2:2015cv02708
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SULLIVAN
Defendant:
PETER D. ESPOSITO , FEDEX FREIGHT, INC. , JOHN DOE 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HAN v. FEDEX FREIGHT, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02276
Plaintiff:
HOSUK HAN
Defendant:
FEDEX FREIGHT, INC. , JOHN DOE 1-5 and ABC COMPANY 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SEPTAK et al v. FEDEX FREIGHT, INC. et al
as 3:2014cv05591
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SEPTAK and LISA SEPTAK
Defendant:
FEDEX FREIGHT, INC. and JOHN DOE RESPONSIBLE PARTIES (1-4)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
EPSTEIN et al v. FEDEX FREIGHT, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv07838
Plaintiff:
EDWARD EPSTEIN and TATIANA EPSTEIN
Defendant:
FEDEX FREIGHT, INC. , JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10, JANE DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOULTON v. FEDEX et al
as 3:2013cv02276
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MOULTON
Defendant:
FEDEX, FEDEX FREIGHT, INC. , JOHN DOES 1-5 (fictitious names) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
TAYLOR et al v. DEANE et al
as 2:2013cv00979
Plaintiff:
KATHY TAYLOR , JAHQUAN SPURGEON , NAQUEL MYERS and others
Defendant:
JAMES R. DEANE, FEDEX FREIGHT EAST and JOHN DOES 1-4
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
JACKSON v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSRUANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv00422
Plaintiff:
RICHARD JACKSON
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSRUANCE COMPANY and FEDEX FREIGHT EAST INC. GROUP BENEFIT PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
LOUGHMAN v. MUNDING et al
as 1:2007cv05272
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA LOUGHMAN
Defendant:
MARK E. MUNDING, FEDEX CORP., FEDEX GROUND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
RUTKOWSKI v. ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION et al
as 1:2007cv04442
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RUTKOWSKI
Defendant:
ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION, ABF FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., AVERITT EXPRESS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
