Cases
State of Alaska Department of Fish and Game v. Federal Subsistence Board, et al.
as 24-179
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
Defendant / Appellee: FEDERAL SUBSISTENCE BOARD, DAVID SCHMID, in his official capacity as the Regional Supervisor for the United States Forest Service, SONNY PERDUE, in his official capacity as the United States Secretary of Agriculture and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: ORGANIZED VILLAGE OF KAKE
State of Alaska Department of v. Federal Subsistence Board, et al
as 22-35097
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
Defendant / Appellee: FEDERAL SUBSISTENCE BOARD, DAVID SCHMID, in his official capacityas the Regional Supervisor for the United States Forest Service, SONNY PERDUE, in his official capacity as the United States Secretary of Agriculture and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: ORGANIZED VILLAGE OF KAKE
State of Alaska, Department of Fish and Game v. Federal Subsistence Board et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00195
Defendant: Chad Padgett, Anthony Christianson, Rhonda A. Pitka and others
Plaintiff: State of Alaska, Department of Fish and Game
Amicus Curiae: Attorney Jon Tillinghast and First Alaskans Institute
Intervenor Defendant: Organized Village of Kake
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Right to Privacy Act
Lincoln Peratrovich, et al v. USA, et al
as 12-36070
Plaintiff - Appellee: LINCOLN PERATROVICH, SHAKAN KWAAN, Tlingit Band of Rural Alaska residents and TAANTA KWAAN, Tlingit Band of Rural Alaskan residents
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TOM VILSAK, Secretary of Agriculture, KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior and others
Intervenor-Defendant: STATE OF ALASKA
Lincoln Peratrovich, et al v. USA, et al
as 12-35010
Plaintiff - Appellant: LINCOLN PERATROVICH, SHAKAN KWAAN, Tlingit Band of Rural Alaska residents and TAANTA KWAAN, Tlingit Band of Rural Alaskan residents
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TOM VILSAK, Secretary of Agriculture, KEN SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF ALASKA
Lincoln Peratrovich, et al v. USA, et al
as 11-36051
Plaintiff - Appellee: LINCOLN PERATROVICH, SHAKAN KWAAN, Tlingit Band of Rural Alaska residents and TAANTA KWAAN, Tlingit Band of Rural Alaskan residents
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TOM VILSAK, Secretary of Agriculture, KEN SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior and others
Intervenor-Defendant: STATE OF ALASKA
State of Alaska, et al v. Federal Subsistence, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-35723
Plaintiff - Appellant: STATE OF ALASKA
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL SUBSISTENCE BOARD, MICHAEL FLEAGLE, Chairman, Federal Subsistence Board, DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary of the Interior and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee: CHEESH-NA TRIBAL COUNCIL and LARRY SINYON
Amicu: SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION
AK Legis Cncl, et al v. Babbitt, Bruce, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 98-5405
Plaintiff - Appellant: The Alaska Legislative Council, Alaska State Legislature, Beverly Masek, Rustic Wilderness Subdivision; in his capacity as a member of the Alaska State Legislature and as an individual, Scott Ogan, in his capacity as a member of the Alaska State Legislature and as an individual and others
Defendant - Appellee: Bruce C. Babbitt, in his capacity as Secretary of Interior, Daniel R. Glickman, in his capacity as Secretary of Agriculture, Pat Shea, in his capacity as Director, Bureau of Land Management; United States Department of the Interior and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellant: Dale Bondurant, Warren Olson and The Alaska Constitutional Legal Defense Fund
Amicus Curiae: Alaska Fish and Wildlife Federation and Outdoor Council, Inc., Alaska Fish and Wildlife Conservation Fund, Inc., Richard H. Bishop and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?