Cases 1 - 10 of 14
PYNQ Logistics Services, Inc. v. FedEx Ground Packaging System, Inc.
as 3:2023cv05881
Plaintiff:
PYNQ Logistics Services, Inc.
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Packaging System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Cole v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. et al
as 2:2023mc00162
Plaintiff:
Nancy Cole
Defendant:
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. and Andrea Holman
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv06902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Federal Express Corp. et al v. Unger Fabrik, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv06670
Plaintiff:
Federal Express Corp. and FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Defendant:
Unger Fabrik, LLC, John Yamada, Ajay Aggarwal and others
Federal Express Corp. et al v. Unger Fabrik, LLC et al
as 2:2021mc01024
Plaintiff:
Federal Express Corp. and FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Defendant:
Unger Fabrik, LLC, John Yamada, Ajay Aggarwal and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00135
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Robert Anderson et al v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv08019
Plaintiff:
Robert Anderson and Marques T. Sutton
Defendant:
Does and FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Unique Scott v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc et al
as 8:2017cv01770
Defendant:
Does and FedEx Ground Package System, Inc
Plaintiff:
Unique Scott
Kalaj Inc v. FedEx Ground Package System et al
as 5:2017cv02060
Defendant:
Does and FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kalaj, Inc and N and C Trucking, Inc
Yas Frontline Development Inc v. Fed Ex Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv06525
Defendant:
Fed Ex Corporation, FedEx Corporate Services, Inc and FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Yas Frontline Development Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
