Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Durford v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2017cv23504
Plaintiff:
Sean Durford
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company and FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Price et al v. Federal Express Corporation et al
as 8:2017cv01075
Plaintiff:
Stella Price and Mariah Price
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation and Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lozano v. Fedex Ground Package
as 6:2017cv00208
Plaintiff:
Monica Lozano
Defendant:
Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Diaz v. The Stan Group, Inc et al
as 6:2015cv00418
Plaintiff:
Ruben Diaz
Defendant:
The Stan Group, Inc and Fedex Ground Packaging System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NIMA Express, Inc. v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
as 8:2015cv00467
Plaintiff:
Nima Express, Inc.
Defendant:
Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Perez et al v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
as 0:2013cv62577
Plaintiff:
Joel Perez and JP Global Express, Inc.
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harting v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
as 8:2013cv02925
Plaintiff:
Sheree Harting
Defendant:
Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leis v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00043
Plaintiff:
Mark Leis
Defendant:
Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Geisler et al v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
as 3:2012cv01189
Plaintiff:
Michael S Geisler and Matthew E Howell
Defendant:
Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
