Cases 1 - 10 of 100
State Attorney's Office v. Gonzalez-Romero
as 8:2026cv03439
Plaintiff:
State Attorney's Office
Defendant:
Fernando Gonzalez-Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv27810
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02946
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02952
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Valverde v. Federal Express Corporation
as 6:2026cv02501
Plaintiff:
Fernando Valverde
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02866
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens:Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv27183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Matus et al v. GUZMAN
as 1:2026cv27073
Plaintiff:
Fernando Matus, Julieta Alonso and Oremia Laurencio
Defendant:
DOMINIC GUZMAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv62777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ramos v. Federal Express Corporation
as 9:2026cv81218
Plaintiff:
Fernando Ramos
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
