Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 11 - 20 of 24
REPUBLIC FIRST BANK v. JEMAL et al
as 1:2012mc00015
Plaintiff: REPUBLIC FIRST BANK
Defendant: SHARON JEMAL and STEPHEN S. JEMAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv07350
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv02232
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
REPUBLIC FIRST BANK v. SSJ DEVELOPMENT OF CAPE MAY
as 1:2011mc00007
Plaintiff: REPUBLIC FIRST BANK
Defendant: SSJ DEVELOPMENT OF CAPE MAY
REPUBLIC FIRST BANK v. SSJ DEVELOPMENT OF CAPE MAY LLC
as 2:2011mc00065
Plaintiff: REPUBLIC FIRST BANK
Defendant: SSJ DEVELOPMENT OF CAPE MAY LLC
REPUBLIC FIRST BANK v. JEMAL et al
as 1:2010mc00033
Plaintiff: REPUBLIC FIRST BANK
Defendant: STEPHEN S. JEMAL and SHARON JEMAL
DECEMBER 1995 INVESTMENT CLUB et al v. FIRST AMERICANO FINANCIAL CORP. et al
as 2:2009cv05534
Plaintiff: DECEMBER 1995 INVESTMENT CLUB, GEORGE ARGAST, GERALDINE ARGAST and others
Defendant: FIRST AMERICANO FINANCIAL CORP., FIRST BANK AMERICANO, JOSEPH A. GINARTE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03441
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
REPUBLIC FIRST BANK v. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv02333
Plaintiff: REPUBLIC FIRST BANK
Defendant: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY and GENERAL LAND ABTRACT COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract None
REPUBLIC FIRST BANK v. KLEEN RITE ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 3:2007cv04043
Plaintiff: REPUBLIC FIRST BANK
Defendant: KLEEN RITE ENTERPRISES, INC., DONALD JAFFE, INC. and NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF TAXATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?