Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Kyle Beatty v. Aurora Loan Services LLC et al
as 8:2009cv00793
Plaintiff:
Kyle Beatty
Defendant:
Aurora Loan Services LLC, First Magnus Financial Corporation, Quality Loan Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Type:
Real Property
Edwin O. Calulot v. First Magnus Financial Corporations et al
as 5:2009cv01081
Plaintiff:
Edwin O Calulot
Defendant:
First Magnus Financial Corporations, Homecomings Financial LLC, Homecomings Financial LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal - Foreclosure
Genavia et al
as 3:2009cv01107
Plaintiff:
Patricia Genavia and Emmanuel Genavia
Defendant:
First Magnus Financial Corporation, Washington Mutual, California Reconveyance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wong et al v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv01612
Plaintiff:
Carmella Wong and William Wong
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rojas v. First Magnus Financial Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv00464
Plaintiff:
Manuel R Rojas and Manuel R Rojas
Defendant:
First Magnus Financial Corporation, Countrywide Financial, Countrywide Financial and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ivonne Penaredondo v. ETS Services, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv00960
Plaintiff:
Ivonne Penaredondo and Ivonne Penaredondo
Defendant:
ETS Services, LLC, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., First Magnus Financial Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Sanny Tirtohadi et al v. First Magnus Financial Corporation et al
as 5:2008cv01760
Plaintiff:
Sanny Tirtohadi and Sanny Tirtohadi
Defendant:
First Magnus Financial Corporation, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
