Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Cambridge of California, Inc. v. Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company. et al
as 1:2010pf10000
Plaintiff:
Cambridge of California, Inc.
Defendant:
Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company, Valle Foam Industries, Inc., Domfoam International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Becky's Carpet and Tile Superstore of Fairview Heights, Inc. et al v. Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company et al
as 1:2010pf10003
Plaintiff:
Becky's Carpet and Tile Superstore of Fairview Heights, Inc. , Becky's Carpet and Tile Superstore of Hazelwood, Inc. , Becky's Carpet and Tile Superstore of St. Peters, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company, Valle Foam Industries, Inc., Domfoam International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Cambridge of California, Inc. v. Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company. et al
as 3:2010pf10000
Defendant:
FFP Holdings, LLC formerly doing business as Flexible Foam Products, Inc. formerly known as Flexible Foam Products LLC, Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company, Valle Foam Industries, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Cambridge of California, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Becky's Carpet and Tile Superstore of Fairview Heights, Inc. et al v. Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company et al
as 3:2010pf10003
Plaintiff:
Becky's Carpet and Tile Superstore of Fairview Heights, Inc., Becky's Carpet and Tile Superstore of Hazelwood, Inc., Becky's Carpet and Tile Superstore of St. Peters, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company, Valle Foam Industries, Inc., Domfoam International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Cambridge of California, Inc. v. Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company. et al
as 3:2010cv01858
Plaintiff:
Cambridge of California, Inc.
Defendant:
Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company, Valle Foam Industries, Inc., Domfoam International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
