Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Pasquinelli et al v. Humbl, LLC. et al
as 3:2022cv00723
Plaintiff:
Matt Pasquinelli and Bryan Paysen
Defendant:
Humbl, LLC., Brian Foote, Jeffrey Hinshaw and others
Terry Fabricant v. Laser Foot Surgery Centers LLC et al
as 2:2021cv04579
Plaintiff:
Terry Fabricant
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, inclusive, and each of them and Laser Foot Surgery Centers LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Eliza Sedaghatfar v. Zarifian, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv11269
Defendant:
Zarifian, Inc., Piran Zarifian, Bao Foot Spa and others
Plaintiff:
Eliza Sedaghatfar
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Foot Locker Inc. et al v. Capri Urban Baldwin LLC et al
as 2:2018cv04275
Defendant:
Capri Urban Baldwin LLC, Does and Professional Security Consultants
Plaintiff:
Foot Locker Inc. and Foot Locker Specialty Inc
Nehemiah Kong v. H and A Properties, L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv00345
Defendant:
Does, H and A Properties, L.P., H and A Real Estate Investments, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nehemiah Kong
Andres Gomez v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc., et al
as 2:2017cv05137
Defendant:
Does and Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Andres Gomez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv03279
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Irma Saffell et al v. American Medical Systems Inc et al
as 2:2017cv04119
Plaintiff:
Betty Adams, Lena Adams, Barbara Aldes and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., American Medical Systems Inc, American Medical Systems LLC and others
Foot Specialists of Northridge Podiatry Group v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, et al
as 2:2017cv03206
Plaintiff:
Foot Specialists of Northridge Podiatry Group
Defendant:
Thomas E. Price and United States Department of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv05868
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
