Cases 1 - 10 of 59
ASCENSION VIA CHRISTI HOSPITAL MANHATTAN INC et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01366
Plaintiff:
ASCENSION VIA CHRISTI HOSPITAL MANHATTAN INC, ASCENSION VIA CHRISTI HOSPITAL PITTSBURG, INC., ASCENSION VIA CHRISTI HOSPITALS WICHITA INC and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Baylor All Saints Medical Center et al v. Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
as 4:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Baylor All Saints Medical Center doing business as Baylor Scott & White All Saints Medical Center - Fort Worth, Baylor Medical Center at Irving doing business as Baylor Scott & White Medical Center-Irving, Baylor Medical Center at Waxahachie doing business as Baylor Scott & White Medical Center Waxahachie and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01309
Plaintiff:
Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Western Reserve Hospital, LLC, Christus St. Frances Cabrini Hospital and others
Petitioner:
Memorial Medical Center
Defendant:
Secretary Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
SHANNON MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
SHANNON MEDICAL CENTER, DCH REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, SONOMA VALLEY HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Baylor All Saints Medical Center v. Becerra
as 4:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Baylor All Saints Medical Center and Baylor All Saints Medical Center doing business as Baylor Scott & White All Saints Medical Center - Fort Worth
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GALEN HOSPITAL ALASKA, INC. et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
GALEN HOSPITAL ALASKA, INC. doing business as ALASKA REGIONAL HOSPITAL, RIVERSIDE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P. doing business as RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P. doing business as REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas v. Becerra
as 4:2023cv04799
Plaintiff:
Baptist Hospitals of Southeast, Ascension Providence, Ascension Seton d/b/a Ascension Seton Hays and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
ST. MARYS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER et al v. XAVIER BECERRA
as 1:2023cv01594
Plaintiff:
ST. MARYS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, NORTH ALABAMA MEDICAL CENTER fka ELIZA COFFEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, ANDALUSIA HEALTH fka COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF ANDALUSIA and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA, Secretary United States Department of Health and Human Services and XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
GALEN OF FLORIDA, INC. et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2023cv00965
Plaintiff:
COLUMBIA PLAZA MEDICAL CENTER OF FORT WORTH SUBSIDIARY, L.P. doing business as MEDICAL CITY FORT WORTH formerly known as PLAZA MEDICAL CENTER OF FORT WORTH, GALEN OF FLORIDA, INC. doing business as HCA FLORIDA ST. PETERSBURG HOSPITAL, BAY AREA HEALTHCARE GROUP, LTD. doing business as CORPUS CHRISTI MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
GALEN HOSPITAL ALASKA, INC. et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv03085
Plaintiff:
GALEN HOSPITAL ALASKA, INC. doing business as ALASKA REGIONAL HOSPITAL, RIVERSIDE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P. doing business as RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P. doing business as REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
