Cases 51 - 60 of 398
Acholonu v. California Franchise Tax Board et al
as 2:2020cv00942
Plaintiff:
Eucharia Acholonu
Defendant:
California Franchise Tax Board and Adam Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03004
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
James Satcher, et al v. Selvi Stanislaus, et al
as 20-35279
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CAROLYN V. SATCHER and JAMES V. SATCHER
Defendant / Appellant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Defendant:
SELVI STANISLAUS, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the California Franchise Tax Board
Sheri Silkotch v. United States District Court of Nevada, Clark County et al
as 5:2020cv00583
Defendant:
The Internal Revenue Service, George R. Carter, United States and others
Plaintiff:
Sheri Silkotch
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
United States et al v. James Allen Gregoline
as 2:2020mc00031
Defendant:
James Allen Gregoline
Plaintiff:
United States, State of California, Franchise Tax Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv01870
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv01873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02314
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
United States of America v. Yates et al
as 2:2020cv00345
Defendant:
State of California Franchise Tax Board, San Joaquin County, Jolene K. Yates and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Albert Kun v. State Bar of California, et al
as 20-15115
Appellant:
ALBERT M KUN
Appellee:
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD and STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
