Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Anderson et al v. The Procter & Gamble Company et al
as 1:2023cv09315
Plaintiff:
Rosalyn Anderson, Eli Erlick, Donna Bailey and others
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company, GlaxoSmithKline LLC, The Kroger Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Adkin et al v. Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv09291
Other:
PHV Sara J. Watkins and PHV Daniel Aaron Rihn
Plaintiff:
Millard Adkins, Rosalyn Anderson, Eli Erlick and others
Defendant:
Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals Inc., Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Kenvue Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
In Re: Oral Phenylephrine Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
as 1:2023md03089
In Re:
In Re: Oral Phenylephrine Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
Plaintiff:
Sandra Yousefzadeh, Robyn Cronin, John Coyle and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Procter & Gamble, GlaxoSmithKline LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Eliquid Universe, Inc. et al v. Omid Holdings, Inc. et al
as 7:2021cv07368
Plaintiff:
ELIQUID UNIVERSE, INC. and MATTHEW LEONARD
Defendant:
OMID HOLDINGS, INC., Adam Frank, Frank Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 tr
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. New Beginning Chiropractic P.C. et al
as 1:2015cv04054
Defendant:
Frank Anderson, D.C., David Colarusso, D.C., Michael Gorelik, D.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Geico Casualty Co., Geico General Insurance Co., Geico Indemnity Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv03375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
