Cases 21 - 30 of 175
James Dorsey v. Officer Thomas, et al
as 21-1858
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES LEE DORSEY
Defendant / Appellee:
MONICA WILIAMS, COLLEEN FRANKLIN, WALTER NICHOLSON, Warden and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02278
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02095
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02035
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Protect Our Parks Inc et al v. Buttigieg et al
as 1:2021cv02006
Defendant:
Deb Haaland, The City of Chicago, The Chicago Park District and others
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Franklin, Nichols Park Advisory Council, Jamie Kalven and others
Amicus Curiae:
University Of Chicago, Civic Committee of the Commercial Club of Chicago, Chicago Urban League and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Colbert v. Franklin Collection Service, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01999
Defendant:
Franklin Collection Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Craig Colbert
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01622
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Fair Housing Center of Central, et al v. Rainbow Realty Group, Inc., et al
as 21-8009
Petitioner:
FAIR HOUSING CENTER OF CENTRAL INDIANA, INC., MARIA GASPAR, FRANKLIN PAZ and others
Respondent:
SUNFLOWER TRUST, ALLEY CAT TRUST, EMPIRE HOLDING CORP. and others
DeWayne Moore v. Jeff Bullard, et al
as 20-3532
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF BULLARD, DARRIN RICE and NATHAN FRANKLIN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEWAYNE MOORE
Glen Franklin v. Thomas Devoe, et al
as 20-3175
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID HILLS and THOMAS DEVOE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLEN FRANKLIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
