Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04015
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02710
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02313
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
BLACKBOOK CAPITAL INC et al v. THE FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY, INC.
as 2:2019cv21772
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN OGELE and BLACKBOOK CAPITAL INC
Defendant:
THE FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
BLACKBOOK CAPITAL, INC. et al v. THE FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY, INC.
as 2:2019cv21492
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN OGELE and BLACKBOOK CAPITAL, INC.
Defendant:
THE FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
IN RE APPLICATION OF TESCO PLC FOR AN ORDER UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1782
as 2:2019cv20613
Petitioner:
TESCO PLC
In Re:
Application of Tesco Plc for Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1782 Granting Leave to Obtain Discovery for Use in Foreign Proceedings
Respondent:
FRANKLIN MUTUAL ADVISERS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
FRANKLIN ARMORY, INC. v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2019cv19323
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, GURBIR GREWAL and others
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN ARMORY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
FRANKLIN ARMORY, INC. v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2019cv19323
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, GURBIR GREWAL and others
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN ARMORY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv09071
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
