Cases 1 - 5 of 5
United States of America v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Chemical Waste Management, Inc., Franklin International, Inc., International Paper Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Cox v. Franklin County Board of Commissioners
as 2:2018cv01631
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Cox
Defendant:
Franklin County Board of Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Hobart Corporation et al v. The Dayton Power and Light Company et al
as 3:2013cv00115
Cross Claimant:
Pharmacia LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and Dayton Power and Light Company
Counter Claimant:
Standard Register Company, Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC, Valley Asphalt Corporation and others
Defendant:
Dayton Industrial Drum, Inc., PPG Industries, Inc., Waste Management of Ohio, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
United States Department of Defense, Sherwin-Williams Company, "John Doe" Corporation(s) and others
Counter Defendant:
Harris Corporation, Franklin Iron & Metal Corp, City of Dayton, Ohio and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ronald H. Barnett, Dryden Road Investments, LLC, South Dayton Land Fill Remediation Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Hobart Corporation and Kelsey-Hayes Company doing business as ZF Active Safety US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
The Sierra Club v. Franklin County, Ohio
as 2:2013cv00111
Plaintiff:
The Sierra Club
Defendant:
Franklin County, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
USA v. Atlas Lederer Co, et al
as 3:1991cv00309
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Atlas Lederer Company , GMC , Senser Metal Co Inc and others
Cross_claimant:
David J Joseph Co and United Scrap Lead Respondent Group
Counter_defendant:
USA
Counter_claimant:
GMC
Cross_defendant:
Atlas Lederer Company , GMC , Senser Metal Co Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
