Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Veenaben Patel, et al v. William Barr, et al
as 21-17024
Petitioner / Appellant:
VEENABEN DHIRUBHAI PATEL and AJAY RAMABHAI PATEL
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Former U.S. Attorney General, CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, THOMAS HOMAN, Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Veenaben Patel, et al v. William Barr, et al
as 20-16399
Respondent:
MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Acting National Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, JASON CILIBERTI, Assistant Phoenix Field Office Director, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, FRED FIGUEROA, Warden of the Eloy Detention Center and others
Petitioner:
VEENABEN DHIRUBHAI PATEL and AJAY RAMABHAI PATEL
Jhonnatan Brinez Urdaneta, et al v. Keeton, et al
as 20-16363
Respondent:
FRED FIGUEROA, in his official capacity as Warden of the Eloy Detention Center, ALBERT R. CARTER, in his official capacity as Acting Phoenix Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, JASON CILIBERTI, in his official capacity as Assistant Phoenix Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
BISMER RODRIGUEZ ALVAREZ, LANDY SANCHEZ RAMOS, CLAUDIA AVALOS INCHICAQUE and others
Amarjit Singh v. USDC-CASD
as 19-70603
Not Classified By Court:
In re: AMARJIT SINGH, GREGORY ARCHAMBEAULT, in his official capacity as San Diego Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, JAMES DOBSON, in his official capacity as Acting Assistant San Diego Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Petitioner:
AMARJIT SINGH
Jose Balderrama v. Fred Figueroa, Warden, et al
as 09-71857
Petitioner:
JOSE BALDERRAMA
Respondent:
RANDY BLADES, LAWRENCE WASDEN and FRED FIGUEROA, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
