Cases filed in Delaware
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00895
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Daffern et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00817
Plaintiff: Brycen Daffern, David Dahl, Susan Dailey and others
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Bravo et al v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00901
Defendant: United States of America
Plaintiff: Roel Fuentes Bravo and Sony Magdaly Fuentes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
de la Fuente et al v. Diorio et al
as 1:2018cv01761
Defendant: Gregory Sessler, Tom A. Alberg, Peter Van Oppen and others
Plaintiff: Jesus Ladron Sanchez and David Plaza de la Fuente
Nominal Defendant: Impnj, Inc. and Impinj, Inc.
Frodyma v. Albany Molecular Research, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00971
Plaintiff: Stanley Frodyma
Defendant: Albany Molecular Research, Inc., Thomas E. D'Ambra, David H. Deming and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Witmer v. Albany Molecular Research, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00942
Plaintiff: Colleen Witmer
Defendant: Albany Molecular Research, Inc., Thomas E. D'Ambra, David H. Deming and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Eyre v. Albany Molecular Research Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00932
Plaintiff: Michael Eyre
Defendant: Albany Molecular Research Inc., Thomas E. D'Ambra, Ph.D, William S. Marth and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Fuente et al v. Powa Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00093
Plaintiff: Serafin Fuente and Carlos Romero
Defendant: Powa Technologies, Inc. and Powa Technologies Group PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gibbs v. Robinson et al
as 1:2008cv00480
Plaintiff: Arson I. Gibbs, Sr.
Defendant: Sue L. Robinson, Anthony J. Scirica, Dolores K. Sloviter and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?