Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Williams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02169
Defendant:
Inc. Davol and C.R. BARD INC
Plaintiff:
Debra G. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01001
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Williams v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01286
Plaintiff:
Richard G. Williams, Sr.
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Depuy Orthopedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2014dp20612
Plaintiff:
Rosemary G. Williams
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams, Jr et al v. VOLT 2012-NPL1 Asset Holdings Trust et al
as 1:2012cv01446
Plaintiff:
Earl Williams, Jr and Viveca G Williams
Defendant:
VOLT 2012-NPL1 Asset Holdings Trust and Vericrest Financial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. et al v. Catlett Quality Plumbing & Heating, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv00188
Plaintiff:
Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. and CHK Utica, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Catlett Quality Plumbing & Heating, Inc. , Schmuck Farms, LLC , Mark S. Addis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Williams-Jordan v. Myers et al
as 3:2009cv02864
Plaintiff:
Mary G. Williams-Jordan
Defendant:
Walter T. Myers and Robin T. Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Corbin et al v. Ferguson et al
as 3:2009mc00057
Plaintiff:
Edward Corbin, Barbara Sewell, Linette Hemans and others
Defendant:
Merlyn Ferguson and Sandra L. Ferguson-Hunte
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
