Cases 1 - 10 of 87
In Re: Cleveland Brothers Data Incident Litigation
as 1:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
Randy Thomas, Gabrielle Thomas and Robert MacMichael
Defendant:
Cleveland Brothers Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BICKINGS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00600
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL BICKINGS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA doing business as UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
WOOD-BIANCHI et al v. DINH et al
as 2:2022cv01540
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL WOOD-BIANCHI and AUDREY WOOD-BIANCHI
Defendant:
HANH H DINH and CHAU M TRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
VASQUEZ v. SINKLER
as 2:2022cv00567
Plaintiff:
HILCIA VASQUEZ
Defendant:
MOSES A SINKLER
3Rd Party Defendant:
Gabriel Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
CUCUL, et al v. GABRIEL BROTHERS, INC., et al
as 2:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Cesar Cucul and Veronica Cucul
Defendant:
Gabriel Brothers, Inc., Gabe's, JOHN DOES 1-10 (FICTITIOUS PROPERTY OWNER) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAAS v. LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04189
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL ANN HAAS
Defendant:
LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., AMERICAN REGENT, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAROTHERS v. RUBINSTEIN et al
as 2:2021cv02210
Plaintiff:
KRISTIN CAROTHERS
Defendant:
IRIS RUBINSTEIN and GABRIELLE RUBINSTEIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LAURA v. JACKSON
as 2:2020cv01351
Defendant:
RICHIE JACKSON and RICHIE ROBERTS JACKSON
Plaintiff:
GABRIELLE LAURA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv06138
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. CEPEDA et al
as 2:2019cv04294
Defendant:
TRANSFER TRAILER SERVICES, VOYAGER TRUCKING CORPORATION, ABC CORPORATION (s) 1 THROUGH 10 and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
