Cases 1 - 10 of 24,345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03752
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
POPELNIAK v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv03770
Plaintiff:
YULIIA POPELNIAK
Defendant:
Secretary Alejandro N Mayorkas, Director UR M JADDOU, TED H. KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
SANCHEZ LIVIA v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv03772
Plaintiff:
LISBET SANCHEZ LIVIA
Defendant:
Alejandro N Mayorkas, UR M JADDOU, TED H. KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Wolms et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv03773
Plaintiff:
Ashley N. Wolms and Waseh Hashmi
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
