Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Luster v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2023cv01311
Petitioner:
George Luster
Respondent:
James Dzurenada, Nevada Attorney General and James Dzurenda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
George Luster v. Director Nevada Department of, et al
as 20-16028
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL and DIRECTOR NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant:
GEORGE LUSTER
George Luster v. Jerry Howell
as 19-70849
Petitioner:
GEORGE LUSTER
Respondent:
JERRY HOWELL, Warden
George Luster v. Jerry Howell, et al
as 19-15209
Petitioner / Appellant:
GEORGE LUSTER
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and JERRY HOWELL, Warden
Luster v. Howell et al
as 2:2018cv01213
Respondent:
Jerry Howell and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Petitioner:
George Luster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
George Luster v. Director Nevada Department of, et al
as 17-16702
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEORGE LUSTER
Respondent - Appellee:
DIRECTOR NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
George Luster v. Attorney General for the State, et al
as 13-17683
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEORGE LUSTER
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and DIRECTOR NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
George Luster, Jr. v. USDC-NVL
as 13-71031
:
In re: GEORGE LUSTER
Petitioner:
GEORGE LUSTER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS
Real Party In Interest:
DIRECTOR NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
George Luster v. James Schomig, et al
as 11-17769
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE LUSTER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES SCHOMIG and MARTHA SIMS
Luster v. Neven et al
as 2:2010cv01661
Defendant:
Jeremy Bean, Francis Kim, Dwight Neven and others
Plaintiff:
George Luster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
