Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Daughdrill v. Georgia-Pacific Monticello, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Jody Daughdrill
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific Monticello, LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Norwood v. Georgia-Pacific Monticello LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00149
Plaintiff:
Ruth Norwood
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific Monticello LLC, John Does 1-5 and XYZ Corporations 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Confer et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2014cv00069
Plaintiff:
Edward Confer and Ginger Confer
Defendant:
3M Company, Georgia-Pacific, LLC , Honeywell International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ford v. Georgia-Pacific RPC LLC
as 3:2012cv00460
Plaintiff:
Orlando Neil Ford
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific RPC LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brewer v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00014
Plaintiff:
J. R. Brewer
Defendant:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. and Georgia-Pacific, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ethridge v. Georgia-Pacific Monticello LLC
as 2:2009cv00025
Plaintiff:
Gary Ethridge
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific Monticello LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Priester v. Crane Co. et al
as 1:2008cv00319
Plaintiff:
Melissa Priester
Defendant:
Crane Co., Garlock, Inc., Ingersoll Rand and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Reeves v. Afton Pumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00141
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Reeves, Robert L. Reeves, Robert L. Reeves and others
Defendant:
Afton Pumps, Inc., AGCO Corporation, AGCO Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Spann, et al v. Airco, Inc., et al
as 3:2002cv01645
Defendant:
Honeywell International, Inc., American Chemistry Council, Goodrich Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas M. Spann and Theresa Spann
Petitioner:
Ronald Simon & Associates and Law Office of Herschel L. Hobson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
