Cases 1 - 10 of 30
State of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-3292
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF OHIO and STATE OF TENNESSEE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ASST. SECRETARY JO-ELLEN DARCY, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. and NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION
State of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 19-3500
Intervenor / Appellee:
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION and NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
ADMINISTRATOR GINA MCCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator, U.S. E.P.A., UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF OHIO and STATE OF TENNESSEE
Highland Park, City of v. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 2:2016cv13840
Defendant:
Environmental Protection Agency, Gina McCarthy, Robert A Kaplan and others
Plaintiff:
Highland Park, City of
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. ยง 1365
Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. v. EPA, et al
as 16-3622
Petitioner:
CLIFFS NATURAL RESOURCES INC.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and GINA MCCARTHY
State Of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 16-3564
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF OHIO, ATTORNEY GENERAL BILL SCHUETTE, on Behalf of the People of Michigan and STATE OF TENNESSEE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JO-ELLEN DARCY, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) and others
Arizona Mining Association, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-4404
:
In re: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FINAL RULE: CLEAN WATER RULE: DEFINITION OF "WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES:, 80 FED.REG.37,054, PUBLISHED ON JUNE 29, 2015. (MCP NO. 135)
Petitioner:
ARIZONA MINING ASSOCIATION, ARIZONA FARM BUREAU, ASSOCIATION OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Texas Alliance for Responsible v. EPA, et al
as 15-4351
:
In re: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FINAL RULE: CLEAN WATER RULE: DEFINITION OF "WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES:, 80 FED.REG.37,054, PUBLISHED ON JUNE 29, 2015. (MCP NO. 135)
Petitioner:
TEXAS ALLIANCE FOR RESPONSIBLE GROWTH, ENVIRONMENT AND TRANSPORTATION
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
In re: Amer Exploration & Mining Assn v. EPA, et al
as 15-4305
:
In re: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FINAL RULE: CLEAN WATER RULE: DEFINITION OF "WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES:, 80 FED.REG.37,054, PUBLISHED ON JUNE 29, 2015. (MCP NO. 135)
Petitioner:
AMERICAN EXPLORATION & MINING ASSOCIATION
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, JO-ELLEN DARCY and others
Texas Alliance for Responsible v. EPA, et al
as 15-4234
:
In re: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FINAL RULE: CLEAN WATER RULE: DEFINITION OF "WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES:, 80 FED.REG.37,054, PUBLISHED ON JUNE 29, 2015. (MCP NO. 135)
Petitioner:
TEXAS ALLIANCE FOR RESPONSIBLE GROWTH, ENVIRONMENT AND TRANSPORTATION
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Assn of American Railroads, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-4211
:
In re: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FINAL RULE: CLEAN WATER RULE: DEFINITION OF "WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES:, 80 FED.REG.37,054, PUBLISHED ON JUNE 29, 2015. (MCP NO. 135)
Petitioner:
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS and PORT TERMINAL RAILROAD ASSOCIATION
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
