Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Cedar Park Assembly of God of Kirkland, Washington v. Myron Kreidler, et al
as 23-35585
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CEDAR PARK ASSEMBLY OF GOD OF KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellant:
MYRON KREIDLER, in his official capacity as Insurance Commissioner for the State of Washington, AKA Mike Kreidler and JAY ROBERT INSLEE, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Washington
Cedar Park Assembly of God of Kirkland, Washington v. Myron Kreidler, et al
as 23-35560
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CEDAR PARK ASSEMBLY OF GOD OF KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
MYRON KREIDLER, in his official capacity as Insurance Commissioner for the State of Washington, AKA Mike Kreidler and JAY ROBERT INSLEE, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Washington
Leonard Peltier, et al v. Joel Sacks, et al
as 21-35817
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LEONARD PELTIER
Plaintiff:
CHAUNCEY PELTIER
Defendant / Appellant:
JOEL SACKS, individually and in his capacity as Director of the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries
Defendant:
TIMOTHY CHURCH, individually and in his capacity as Public Affairs Manager of the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries, JAY ROBERT INSLEE, individually and in his capacity as Governor of the State of Washington, EDWARD P. WOODS and others
Rebecca Faust v. Jay Inslee, et al
as 21-35797
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REBECCA JOY FAUST
Defendant / Appellee:
JAY ROBERT INSLEE, Governor of the State of Washington and ANNETTE MEYER, Acting Director, Department of Enterprise Services
Leonard Peltier, et al v. Joel Sacks, et al
as 21-35778
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEONARD PELTIER
Plaintiff:
CHAUNCEY PELTIER
Defendant / Appellee:
JOEL SACKS, individually and in his capacity as Director of the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries
Defendant:
TIMOTHY CHURCH, individually and in his capacity as Public Affairs Manager of the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries, JAY ROBERT INSLEE, individually and in his capacity as Governor of the State of Washington, EDWARD P. WOODS and others
Linda Schumacher, et al v. Jay Inslee, et al
as 21-80031
Respondent:
CHERYL STRANGE, in Her Official Capacity as Acting Secretary of the Washington Department of Social and Health Services, JAY ROBERT INSLEE, in His Official Capacity as Governor of the State of Washington and SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION HEALTHCARE 775NW, a labor organization
Petitioner:
MIRANDA THORPE, Washington Individual Providers, SURENA ISRAEL, ROBB ISRAEL and others
Rebecca Faust v. Jay Inslee, et al
as 20-35960
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRIS LIU, Director, Department of Enterprise Services and JAY ROBERT INSLEE, Governor of the State of Washington
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REBECCA JOY FAUST
Sharrie Yates v. AFSCME Council 28 (WFSE), et al
as 20-35879
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHARRIE YATES
Defendant / Appellee:
SUE BIRCH, in her Official Capacity as Director of the Washington State Healthcare Authority, JAY ROBERT INSLEE, in his Official Capacity as Governor of the State of Washington and WASHINGTON FEDERATION OF STATE EMPLOYEES, AFSCME COUNCIL 28, AFL-CIO, a labor organization
Cedar Park Assembly of God v. Myron Kreidler, et al
as 20-35507
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CEDAR PARK ASSEMBLY OF GOD OF KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
MYRON KREIDLER, in his official capacity as Insurance Commissioner for the State of Washington, AKA Mike Kreidler and JAY ROBERT INSLEE, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Washington
Cindy Ochoa v. Service Employees Internationa, et al
as 19-35870
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CINDY ELLEN OCHOA, as an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
JAY ROBERT INSLEE, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Washington, CHERYL STRANGE, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Social and Health Services, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 775, an unincorporated labor association and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
