Social Security Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Graham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00004
Plaintiff: Kanesha A. Graham
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security and Martin O' Malley
Interested Party: Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Graham v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv00697
Plaintiff: Anthony Graham
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Graham v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv02411
Plaintiff: Reginald M. Graham
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Graham v. Saul
as 1:2019cv04468
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Nicole Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GRAHAM v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00307
Plaintiff: BONNIE SUE GRAHAM
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Undetermined: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Graham v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv01401
Plaintiff: April Lasheba Graham
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Graham v. Colvin
as 4:2016cv00377
Plaintiff: Karen A. Graham
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Graham v. Social Security Administration We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2014cv00102
Plaintiff: Diane Onofrio Graham
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Graham v. Astrue
as 1:2008cv03069
Plaintiff: Marshall Graham
Defendant: Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Graham v. Astrue
as 1:2008mi00333
Plaintiff: Marshall Graham
Defendant: Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?