Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Grand River Dam Authority v. FERC
as 24-1071
Petitioner:
Grand River Dam Authority
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)- MDL NO. 2925
as 1:2020mc00008
Plaintiff:
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY LLC, AK STEEL CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
In Re:
RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)- MDL NO. 2925
Interested Party:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION, CVR ENERGY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY v. CSX TRANSPORTATION INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00273
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION INC., UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Wagoner Cty Rural Water Dist, et al v. Grand River Dam Authority, et al
as 08-5120
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAGONER COUNTY RURAL WATER DISTRICT NO. 2, WAGONER COUNTY RURAL WATER DISTRICT NO. 7, WAGONER COUNTY RURAL WATER DISTRICT NO. 9 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION and others
Wagoner County Rural Water District No. 2 et al v. Grand River Dam Authority et al
as 4:2007cv00642
Plaintiff:
Wagoner County Rural Water District No. 2, Wagoner County Rural Water District No. 2, Wagoner County Rural Water District No. 7 and others
Defendant:
Grand River Dam Authority, United States of America, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Brady, Mike, et al v. FERC
as 04-1058
Petitioner:
Mike Brady and Cheryl Creekmore
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
The Grand River Dam Authority
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
