Cases filed in New York
McCausland v. Gray Television, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv07539
Plaintiff: David McCausland
Defendant: GRAY TELEVISION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1715 Class Action Fairness Act of 2005
Roberts v. Gray Television, Inc.
as 5:2020cv00607
Defendant: Gray Television, Inc.
Plaintiff: Zachary Roberts
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Cellino & Barnes, P.C. v. Hearst Television, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv08778
Plaintiff: CELLINO & BARNES, P.C.
Defendant: Tegna, Inc., Tribune Media Company, HEARST TELEVISION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Northtown Automotive Companies, Inc. v. Hearst Television Inc., et al
as 1:2018cv08485
Defendant: TEGNA INC., HEARST TELEVISION, INC., TRIBUNE MEDIA COMPANY and others
Plaintiff: NORTHTOWN AUTOMOTIVE COMPANIES INC., and Northtown Automotive Companies Inc.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: SINCLAIR BROADCAST GROUP, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Crowley Webb and Associates, Inc. v. Hearst Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv07976
Defendant: Tegna Inc., Tribune Media Company, Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Crowley Webb and Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Cellino & Barnes, P.C. v. Hearst Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv07826
Plaintiff: Cellino & Barnes, P.C.
Defendant: Tegna Inc., Tribune Media Company, Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?