Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Smith v. Gamboa, et al.
as 24-2790
Petitioner:
RONALD J. SMITH
Respondent:
MARTIN GAMBOA, Warden and ROB BONTA, Attorney General, State of California
Wilson v. Gamboa, et al.
as 24-1818
Petitioner:
LUKE NOEL WILSON
Respondent:
MARTIN GAMBOA, Warden, Avenal State Prison and ROB BONTA, Attorney General, State of California
Hill v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-1583
Petitioner:
NATHAN HILL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party:
GAVIN NEWSOM, RALPH DIAZ, Director of CDCR, KEN CLARK, Warden of CSP-Corcoran and others
Gamboa v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2024cv01270
Plaintiff:
Julianna Felix Gamboa
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Yu v. Ndoh, et al.
as 24-958
Petitioner:
DANIEL YU
Respondent:
ROSEMARY NDOH, Warden, MARTIN GAMBOA, Avenal State Prison and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Real Party in Interest
Cramer v. Director of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
as 23-4437
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW B. CRAMER
Defendant / Appellee:
DIRECTOR OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, WARDEN OF NORTH KERN STATE PRISON, GAMBOA, Correctional Officer and others
United States of America v. Gamboa
as 23-594
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANCISCA RODRIGUEZ GAMBOA, Diana Elizabeth Padilla and Diana Padilla Gamboa
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Gamboa
as 23-322
Defendant / Appellant:
FRANCISCA RODRIGUEZ GAMBOA, Diana Elizabeth Padilla and Diana Padilla Gamboa
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Edgar A. Gamboa, M.D., Medical Corp. v. Becerra
as 5:2022cv02865
Plaintiff:
Edgar A. Gamboa, M.D., Medical Corp.
Defendant:
Secretary Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Rodriguez Gamboa v. Garland
as 22-163
Petitioner:
FRANCISCA RODRIGUEZ GAMBOA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
