Cases 1 - 9 of 9
PHEABUS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv51836
Plaintiff:
GARY JOSEPH PHEABUS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Orso v. Joseph
as 9:2021mc80145
Plaintiff:
Matthew Orso as successor trustee to Kenneth D. Bell in his capacity as court-appointed receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC d/b/a ZeekRewards.com
Defendant:
Jean Gary Joseph
MCCLUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv99071
Plaintiff:
GARY JOSEPH MCCLUNG
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOYER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv78119
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GARY JOSEPH BOYER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHESKEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv17205
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GARY JOSEPH SHESKEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HODGE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv19649
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GARY JOSEPH HODGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Devries v. Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC et al
as 9:2012cv81223
Plaintiff:
Amir Haji Abbasi, Francisco Edward Acevedo, Margaret Kathryn Acosta and others
Defendant:
Jonathan Bach, Morgan Stanley, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Robinson v. Nimmons et al
as 3:2009cv00914
Plaintiff:
Vernon Robinson
Defendant:
Ralph W. Nimmons, Jr., Ed Austin, David C. Wiggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph v. State Of Florida
as 1:2008cv21526
Petitioner:
Gary Joseph
Respondent:
State Of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
