Other Statutes Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 237
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Bily-Linder et al
as 1:2023cv00515
Defendant: Gary Grody, Susan Bily-Linder, North Shore South Shore Psychological Services, PLLC and others
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company, et al v. Adin et al
as 1:2023cv00240
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company,, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: David R. Adin, D.O., Sam Chang, D.C., Sam Chang Chiropractic, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Michael Zwirblia Psy.D. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00110
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Michael Zwirblia Psy.D. (A Sole Proprietorship), Michael Zwirblia, Stephen Danyko (A Sole Proprietorship) and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Hazaq Psychological Services, P.C. et al
as 1:2022cv07899
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Hazaq Psychological Services, P.C., Restart Psychological Services, P.C., Grigory Orenbakh, PH.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. S&N NYC, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07830
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: S&N NYC, Inc. doing business as Colden Pharmacy, Shamir Dzhurayev and John Doe Defendants Nos. "1" - "5"
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Datta et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv10531
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Sukdeb Datta, M.D., Datta Endoscopic Surgery & Pain Center, L.L.C., Garden State Neuro Stimulation, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Barakat et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv07532
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Jean-Pierre Barakat, M.D., Dr. Jean Pierre Barakat, M.D. (A Sole Proprietorship), Patriot Medical Care, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Strobeck et al
as 1:2022cv07477
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: John Strobeck, M.D., Integrated Diagnostic Imaging & Cardiology of Staten Island, P.C., Heart Lung Associates Medical, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Strobeck et al
as 2:2022cv07477
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: John Strobeck, M.D., Integrated Diagnostic Imaging & Cardiology of Staten Island, P.C., Heart Lung Associates Medical, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Katanov et al
as 1:2022cv07153
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Albert Katanov, John Doe Defendants 1 through 10 and Allmed Merchandise & Trading Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?