Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 1,008
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Rawlins et al
as 1:2022cv07917
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Sherrie Ann Rawlins, M.D., Sherrie Rawlins Medical P.C., Dr. Sherrie Ann Rawlins (a Sole Proprietorship) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Hazaq Psychological Services, P.C. et al
as 1:2022cv07899
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Hazaq Psychological Services, P.C., Restart Psychological Services, P.C., Grigory Orenbakh, PH.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. S&N NYC, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07830
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: S&N NYC, Inc. doing business as Colden Pharmacy, Shamir Dzhurayev and John Doe Defendants Nos. "1" - "5"
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Clancy et al
as 1:2022cv07635
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Phelan Clancy, N.P., Phelan Clancy NP in Adult Health, P.L.L.C. and John Doe Defendants 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Datta et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv10531
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Sukdeb Datta, M.D., Datta Endoscopic Surgery & Pain Center, L.L.C., Garden State Neuro Stimulation, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Barakat et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv07532
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Jean-Pierre Barakat, M.D., Dr. Jean Pierre Barakat, M.D. (A Sole Proprietorship), Patriot Medical Care, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Strobeck et al
as 1:2022cv07477
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: John Strobeck, M.D., Integrated Diagnostic Imaging & Cardiology of Staten Island, P.C., Heart Lung Associates Medical, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Strobeck et al
as 2:2022cv07477
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: John Strobeck, M.D., Integrated Diagnostic Imaging & Cardiology of Staten Island, P.C., Heart Lung Associates Medical, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Katanov et al
as 1:2022cv07153
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Albert Katanov, John Doe Defendants 1 through 10 and Allmed Merchandise & Trading Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Gardos et al
as 1:2022cv07097
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Peter Sandor Gardos, Ph.D., Maria Del Carmen Antoine, Ph.D., MDCA Psychology Care, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?