Cases 1 - 10 of 439
Gardeley v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00325
Defendant:
William A. Gittere, P. Hernandez, Underwood and others
Plaintiff:
Marque Gardeley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emanuel v. Silber et al
as 2:2024cv01340
Defendant:
Bean, P. Hernandez, Drummond and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Ray Emanuel Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emanuel v. Kirkland et al
as 2:2024cv01285
Defendant:
W. Gitter, Tasheena Cooke, Dent Kirkland and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Emanuel, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al.
as 24-4371
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, WILLIAM GITTERE, STEVEN SISOLAK and others
Plaintiff:
AMMAR HARRIS
Coleman v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00311
Defendant:
P. Hernandez, David C. Drummond, James Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Mister Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz v. M. et al
as 3:2024cv00305
Defendant:
Garcia, Bill A. Gittere, Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ackerman v. Cooke et al
as 2:2024cv01233
Defendant:
Tasheena Cooke, William Ruebart, Warden William Gittere and others
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Gitteres et al
as 3:2024cv00286
Petitioner:
Kelvin Laneil James
Respondent:
William A. Gitteres and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gardeley v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Marque Gardeley
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Brian Williams, J. Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Doyle
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Warden William Gittere, Christopher Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
