Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 426
Ackerman v. Rigney et al
as 2:2024cv00935
Plaintiff: Jin Ackerman
Defendant: Curtis Rigney, T. Phelps, William Gittere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2024cv00923
Plaintiff: JoAquin Hill
Defendant: State of Nevada, Nevada Department of Corrections, Ely State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edmiston v. Saucedo, et al.
as 24-3145
Plaintiff: JUSTIN EDMISTON
Defendant: RICARDO SAUCEDO, JAMES WEILAND, C.E.R.T. "Senior and WILLIAM GITTERE, added per #7 Screening Order; #8 AC
Emil v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-3080
Petitioner: RODNEY L. EMIL
Respondent: WILLIAM GITTERE, ADAM PAUL LAXALT and TIMOTHY FILSON
Gonzales v. Gittere et al
as 2:2024cv00816
Petitioner: Raul Gonzales
Respondent: Warden William Gittere and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Damaste Productions, Inc v. TGIM Films, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv03183
Plaintiff: Damaste Productions, Inc
Defendant: TGIM Films, Inc and Eric Gitter
Cortez v. Stubbs, et al.
as 24-2714
Plaintiff: MOISES JOSUE CORTEZ
Defendant: BRANDON STUBBS, FAC ECF No. 33, JOSE GUZMAN, FAC ECF No. 33, MATTHEW ROMAN and others
McNeil v. Gittere et al
as 3:2024cv00188
Plaintiff: Michael McNeil
Defendant: William Gittere, Walter Romero, Tasheena Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ho v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff: Edmund Ho
Defendant: James Dzurenda, William A. Gittere, David C. Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silsattanak v. The State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff: Erik Silsattanak
Defendant: The State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections, James Dzurenda, William Gittere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?