Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35686
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sara Hamilton v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
as 19-35973
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SARA HAMILTON
Defendant / Appellee:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Stephen Wendell, et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC, et al
as 14-16321
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN WENDELL and LISA WENDELL, for themselves and as successors-in-interest to Maxx Wendell, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
Smithkline Beecham Corporation v. Abbott Laboratorie
as 11-17357
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, DBA GlaxoSmithKline
Defendant - Appellant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES
Carlie Spiers, et al v. GlaxoSmithKline
as 13-80197
Plaintiff - Respondent:
CARLIE SPIERS, SANDRA WALKER, EVELYN WYATT and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, AKA SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Deadra Catlett, et al v. Glaxosmithkline LLC
as 13-80198
Plaintiff - Respondent:
DEADRA CATLETT, NOEMI ALVARADO, DAMITA BRYANT and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Brenda Armstrong, et al v. Glaxosmithkline LLC
as 13-80196
Plaintiff - Respondent:
BRENDA ARMSTRONG, JOBY BAKER, LATONYA BANKS and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Ronald Travis, et al v. GlaxoSmithKline
as 13-80199
Plaintiff - Respondent:
RONALD TRAVIS, MARVIN VINSONHALER, LETHA WHITE and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, AKA SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Marie Lueck, et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC.
as 13-80193
Plaintiff - Respondent:
MARIE LUECK, ANGELA ANDRE, ROBERT D. LUECK and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC.
Connie Emana, et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC.
as 13-80192
Plaintiff - Respondent:
CONNIE EMANA, ELLENDAR ADAMS-MACKERL, ANNETTE AGARD and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
