Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Picozzi v. Bean et al
as 2:2024cv02057
Defendant:
Lt. Binder, Lt. Day, Frank Dreesen and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Picozzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Picozzi v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2024cv01378
Defendant:
Frank Dreesen, R. Wood, James Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Picozzi
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Bean, et al.
as 24-2705
Plaintiff:
DAVID L REED
Defendant:
BEAN, Associate Warden, Lt GLENN FOWLER, JAMES DZURENDA, Director and others
Bradford v. Daniels et al
as 2:2021cv00493
Defendant:
J. Ruiz, Charles Daniels, Brian Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Julius Bradford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Lafferty, Jr. v. Brian Williams, et al
as 20-15061
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERSON, Officer; S/C.O., GLENN FOWLER, Sgt and SANTOS, true name: Isaiah Santos
Defendant:
JOHN, Nurse and BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES LAFFERTY, Jr.
Johnson v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2019cv01263
Defendant:
G Piccinnini, Naphcare LLC, Dr Vicuna and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Bean et al
as 2:2019cv00103
Plaintiff:
David L Reed
Defendant:
Bean, James Dzurenda and Lt Glenn Fowler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adamson v. Emling et al
as 2:2018cv00426
Plaintiff:
Travontay Adamson
Defendant:
A Emling, Glenn Fowler and Brian Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adamson v. Williams et al
as 2:2018cv00071
Plaintiff:
Travontay Adamson
Defendant:
A. Emling, Glenn Fowler, Nevada Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adamson v. Williams et al
as 2:2017cv00615
Plaintiff:
Travontay Adamson
Defendant:
A Emling, Glenn Fowler and Brian Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
