Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Michael Wappler v. Celestine, et al
as 20-14538
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK INCH, secretary, in individual and official capacity, SANTOS, GLENN MORRIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. WAPPLER
Wappler v. Officer Celestine et al
as 1:2020cv23206
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Michael Scichilone, Officer Celestine and others
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Wappler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv70018
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GLENN MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzalez v. Morris et al
as 1:2020cv20359
Plaintiff:
Aurelio Gonzalez
Defendant:
United States Homeland Security and Glenn Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Martinez v. Morris et al
as 1:2019cv25225
Plaintiff:
Roberto A. Martinez
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security and Glenn Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
David Morris v. Southern Intermodal Xpress, et al
as 19-12234
Defendant / Appellee:
UNION SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS and SOUTHERN INTERMODAL XPRESS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID GLENN MORRIS
Spence v. Morris et al
as 1:2019cv20201
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mark Spence
Defendant:
Warden Glenn Morris and U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas v. Morris (Pinellas County)
as 8:2018cv02411
Respondent:
Glenn Morris
Petitioner:
Anthony Jerome Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Morris
as 1:2018cv23306
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jerome Thomas
Defendant:
Warden Glenn Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Morris v. Southern Intermodal Xpress, et al
as 18-10785
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID GLENN MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTHERN INTERMODAL XPRESS, ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS and UNION SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
