Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Cuper Development LLC et al v. City of Cudahy et al
as 2:2024cv02833
Plaintiff:
Cuper Development LLC, Go Cudahy LLC, Davina LLC and others
Defendant:
City of Cudahy, Alfonso Noyola, Elizabeth Alcantar and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jim Cyr et al v. Johnny Robert Macon et al
as 2:2023cv05618
Plaintiff:
Jim Cyr and Aspen Builders, Inc.
Defendant:
Johnny Robert Macon and Go JRM Construction, Inc.
Shop & Go et al v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
Shop & Go a California Sole Proprietorship Doing business as Shop & Go #3 and Adel A. Mohamed
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Synchrony Bank v. Cabinets To Go, LLC
as 5:2022mc00002
Plaintiff:
Synchrony Bank
Defendant:
Cabinets To Go, LLC
Material Witne:
Divyesh Patel
Go-Fresh Produce Inc. v. MF Riko Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01357
Plaintiff:
Go-Fresh Produce, Inc.
Defendant:
MF Riko, Inc. doing business as Riko Fresh Produce Co., Ramiro Espadas, Michael Green and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Go v. Raab et al
as 4:2021cv09455
Plaintiff:
Alvin Go
Defendant:
Michael Raab, Justin Renz, Robert Bazemore and others
Terry Fabricant v. Go Cap Advance, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05628
Plaintiff:
Terry Fabricant
Defendant:
Go Cap Advance, Inc. and DOES 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02247
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CHILL N GO LIQUOR, a California corporation et al v. UNITES STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020at00819
Plaintiff:
BILL MAIDA, CHILL N GO LIQUOR, a California corporation and FADI ELYAS ABBOUD
Defendant:
UNITES STATES OF AMERICA
Chill N Go Liquor, et al. v. USA
as 1:2020cv01497
Plaintiff:
Bill Maida, Fadi Elyas Abboud and Chill N Go Liquor
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
