Cases 1 - 7 of 7
ESTATE OF SANDRA DOHMAN et al v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02910
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF SANDRA DOHMAN and BETTY GOING
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GO v. WALMART INC. et al
as 2:2019cv16635
Plaintiff:
WILMA GO AND PETER GO, HER SPOUSE, WILMA GO and PETER GO
Defendant:
939 ROUTE 1 EDISON, LLC, WALMART INC. A/K/A SAM'S CLUB, JOHN DOES 1-10 (FICTITIOUS NAMES REPRESENTING UNKNOWN INDIVIDUALS) AND/OR XYZ CORPS, 1-10 (FICTITIOUS NAMES REPRESENTING UNKNOWN CORPORATIONS, PARTNERSHIPS AND/OR LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES OR OTHER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
THOMPSON et al v. PRINCE ELIZBETH GO, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv09225
Defendant:
DEF COMPANY 1-10, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, JAMES ROES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL THOMPSON, her husband and TONYA THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GOINGS v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv05308
Plaintiff:
NINA GOINGS
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP , ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TIKHOMIROVA v. TRUMP ENTERTAINMENT RESORTS, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv03544
Plaintiff:
TATYANA TIKHOMIROVA
Defendant:
TRUMP ENTERTAINMENT RESORTS, INC., TRUMP TAJ MAHAL CASINO and GO COFFEE SHOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. LOMAS TRAVEL et al
as 2:2013cv03925
Plaintiff:
LESLIE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
LOMAS TRAVEL, FUN JET, VACATIONS TO GO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GOINGS et al v. CHOPALIC
as 1:2012cv02131
Plaintiff:
SARAH GOINGS and WILLIE GOINGS
Defendant:
MATTHEW A. CHOPALIC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
