Cases 1 - 8 of 8
In re: Gold Resource Corp., et al, et al
as 13-1323
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BANKER NITESH, SCOTT CANTOR and ROBERT D. RHODES
Defendant - Appellee:
GOLD RESOURCE CORPORATION, JASON D. REID, WILLIAM W. REID and others
City of Bristol Pension Fund v. Reid et al
as 1:2013cv00348
Plaintiff:
City of Bristol Pension Fund
Defendant:
William W. Reid, Jason D. Reid, William M. Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Rhodes v. Gold Resource Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv02971
Plaintiff:
Robert D Rhodes
Defendant:
Gold Resource Corporation, William W. Reid, Jason D. Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Cantor v. Gold Resource Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv02832
Plaintiff:
Scott Cantor
Defendant:
Gold Resource Corporation, William W. Reid and Jason D. Reid
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 10 Securities Exchange Act
Tara Gold Resources Corporatio v. SEC
as 11-3083
Petitioner:
TARA GOLD RESOURCES CORPORATION
Respondent:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Tara Gold Resources Corporation v. Hansen
as 1:2009cv01317
Plaintiff:
Tara Gold Resources Corporation
Defendant:
Christian Blair Hansen
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Tara Gold Resources Corporation v. Lateegra Gold Corporation
as 1:2007cv05365
Plaintiff:
Tara Gold Resources Corporation and Tara Gold Resources Corporation
Defendant:
Lateegra Gold Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Tara Gold Resources Corporation v. Wilson
as 1:2007cv00022
Plaintiff:
Tara Gold Resources Corporation and Tara Gold Resources Corporation
Defendant:
Daniel L. Wilson and Daniel L. Wilson
Counter Claimant:
Daniel L. Wilson and Daniel L. Wilson
Counter Defendant:
Tara Gold Resources Corporation and Tara Gold Resources Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
