Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Sigmon v. Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company
as 18-1212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Wayne Sigmon, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Karen Lebauer Hindin
Defendant - Appellee:
Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, MLQ DML Hotel, L.L.C., MLQ DML Spa L.L.C. and others
In Re: Federal Housing Finance
as 13-1122
Petitioner:
UBS Americas Inc., UBS Real Estate Securities Inc., UBS Securities, LLC and others
Respondent:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Federal Housing Finance Agency, as Conservator for the Federal National Mortgage Association and The Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Public Employees' Retirement S v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
as 12-2366
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi, Individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Moody's Investors Service, Inc., Fitch Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, GS Mortgage Securities Corp. and others
Public Employees' Retirement S v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
as 12-614
Petitioner:
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, GS Mortgage Securities Corp. and others
Respondent:
Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi, Individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Moody's Investors Service, Inc., Fitch Inc. and others
Neca-Ibew Health & Welfare Fun v. Goldman Sachs & Co.
as 11-2762
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Neca-Ibew Health & Welfare Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
GS Mortgage Securities Corp., GSAA Home Equity Trust 2007-3, GSAA Home Equity Trust 2007-4 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Goldman Sachs & Co., Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-OA1 and others
Intervenor:
The Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
