Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Duran et al v. New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions et al
as 1:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
Shaun Duran, Monica Fischetti-Palmieri-Williams, Erdem Yildz and others
Defendant:
New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions and Sarita Nair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Mariscal v. Allied Van Lines, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00415
Defendant:
Coleman Worldwide Moving, LLC and Allied Van Lines, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Josefa Gonzalez Mariscal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In Re: $323,647.60 in Funds Belonging to the California Valley Miwok Tribe
as 1:2018cv01194
Plaintiff:
Ramah Navajo Chapter, Pueblo of Zuni and Oglala Sioux Tribe
In Re:
$323,647.60 in Funds Belonging to the California Valley Miwok Tribe
Interpleader:
California Valley Miwok Tribe, Velma White Bear, Gilbert Ramirez, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Sally Jewell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Mendez v. Contreras
as 2:2014cv00799
Plaintiff:
Dulce Esperanza Mendez Gonzalez
Defendant:
Emilio Contreras Batres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wang v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008cv00076
Plaintiff:
Lei Wang
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Evelyn Upchurch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Pivkina v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2007cv01243
Plaintiff:
Inna V. Pivkina
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Evelyn Upchurch and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Pivkina v. Chertoff et al
as 6:2007cv01243
Plaintiff:
Inna V. Pivkina and Inna V. Pivkina
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Evelyn Upchurch and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Liu v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv01194
Plaintiff:
Jin Yan Liu
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Peter D. Keisler, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
