Cases 1 - 10 of 31
ROGERS v. ENGLAND, et al
as 1:2000cv02452
Plaintiff:
MICHELE ROGERS
Defendant:
GORDON R. ENGLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2003 Job Discrimination
Gillan, Martin J. v. Winter, Donald C., et al
as 05-5471
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Martin J. Gillan, IV
Defendant - Terminated Party:
Gordon R. England, Secretary of the Navy
Defendant - Appellee:
Donald C. Winter, Secretary of the Navy
Mueller, Douglas J. v. England, Gordon R., et al
as 05-5396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Douglas J. Mueller
Defendant - Appellee:
Gordon R. England, Secretary of the Navy and Department of the Navy
L&C EUROPA CONTRACTING V NAVY
as 05-1084
Appellee:
GORDON R. ENGLAND, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY
Appellant:
L&C EUROPA CONTRACTING COMPANY, INC.
Piersall, Charles v. Winter, Donald C., et al
as 04-5382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles H. Piersall, III
Defendant - Terminated Party:
Gordon R. England, Secretary of the Navy and Dionel M. Aviles, Acting Secretary of the Navy
Defendant - Appellee:
Donald C. Winter, Secretary of the Navy
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
National Veterans Legal Services Program
L&C EUROPA CONTRACTING V NAVY
as 04-1590
Appellee:
GORDON R. ENGLAND, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY
Appellant:
L&C EUROPA CONTRACTING COMPANY, INC.
LOCKHEED MARTIN V NAVY
as 04-1461
Appellee:
GORDON R. ENGLAND, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY
Appellant:
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
VALENZUELA ENGINEERING V NAVY
as 04-1394
Appellee:
GORDON R. ENGLAND, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY
Appellant:
VALENZUELA ENGINEERING, INC.
SMALLS V US
as 05-1413
Defendant-Appellee:
CENTRAL PHYSICAL EVALUATION BOARD, DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Medical and Regional Office and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
EUGENE C. SMALLS
In Re: England, et al
as 03-5329
In Re - Petitioner:
In re: Gordon R. England, Secretary of the Navy, Department of the Navy, Gerald L. Howeing and others
:
, , and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
