Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Kay Dana v. Idaho Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-35047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAY LYNN DANA, FKA Larry Dana
Defendant / Appellee:
IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOSH TEWALT, BREE DERRICK and others
Sileoni v. Corizon Correctional Health Services et al
as 1:2019cv00427
Defendant:
Corizon Correctional Health Services, Jay Christensen, Rona Seigert and others
Plaintiff:
Maximiliano Sileoni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bourquin v. Corizon Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00328
Defendant:
Corp Civic, Brent D. Reinke, John Does 1-4 and others
Plaintiff:
Edwin Bourquin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Babcock v. Roberts et al
as 1:2018cv00340
Defendant:
Grant Roberts and Corizon Health Services
Plaintiff:
Kelley A.E. Babcock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pieksma v. Atencio et al
as 1:2018cv00257
Plaintiff:
Scott W Pieksma
Defendant:
Henry Atencio, Corizon Correctional Healthcare, Jay Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. Atencio et al
as 1:2018cv00160
Plaintiff:
Mario Gomez
Defendant:
Henry Atencio, Rona Siegert, Migliori and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. Atencio et al
as 1:2018cv00134
Plaintiff:
Mario Gomez
Defendant:
Henry Atencio, Rona Siegert, Samuel Pierson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gallion v. Migliori et al
as 1:2017cv00526
Plaintiff:
Eric James Gallion
Defendant:
John Migliori, Grant Roberts, Corizon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lara v. Corizon Correctional Health Care et al
as 1:2017cv00186
Plaintiff:
Carlos Lara
Defendant:
Corizon Correctional Health Care, Brown, Sam Pierson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruiz v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 1:2017cv00172
Plaintiff:
Ariel Molino Ruiz
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, Idaho Department of Corrections, Grant Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
