Cases 1 - 8 of 8
ANDERSON HOSPITAL et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
ANDERSON HOSPITAL, ASPIRUS RIVERVIEW HOSPITAL, AULTMAN HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
AMITA HEALTH MERCY MEDICAL CENTER AURORA et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2021cv01400
Plaintiff:
D.W. MCMILLAN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH BALL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, BRYAN MEDICAL CENTER - EAST CAMPUS and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER et al v. AZAR
as 1:2019cv03617
Plaintiff:
BRYAN MEDICAL CENTER - EAST CAMPUS, MCLAREN PORT HURON HOSPITAL, RMC ANNISTON and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ANDERSON HOSPITAL et al v. AZAR
as 1:2019cv01386
Plaintiff:
HENRY COUNTY HEALTH, BRYAN MEDICAL CENTER - EAST CAMPUS, HOLY FAMILY MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ADVOCATE CHRIST MEDICAL CENTER, et al. v. AZAR
as 1:2018cv02182
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCAN ST. FRANCIS HEALTH - BEECH GROVE CAMPUS, GUNDERSEN LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER, BRYAN MEDICAL CENTER - EAST CAMPUS and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ANDALUSIA HEALTH et al v. AZAR, II
as 1:2018cv01756
Plaintiff:
KING'S DAUGHTERS' HOSPITAL & HEALTH SERVICES, CENTEGRA HOSPITAL - WOODSTOCK, BRYAN MEDICAL CENTER - EAST CAMPUS and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ADVOCATE CHRIST HOSPITAL et al v. HARGAN
as 1:2017cv02321
Plaintiff:
ADVOCATE CHRIST HOSPITAL , ADVOCATE CONDELL MEDICAL CENTER , ADVOCATE NORTHSIDE HEALTH SYSTEM and others
Defendant:
ERIC D. HARGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
BETHESDA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. BURWELL
as 1:2014cv02068
Plaintiff:
BETHESDA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL , THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA MEDICAL CENTER- UNIVERSITY CAMPUS , PARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
SYLVIA M BURWELL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
