Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Flynn v. NDOC et al
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Dawnyell Flynn
Defendant:
NDOC, FMWCC, Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hendrix v. McCoy et al
as 3:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
Kimberly McCoy, Tanya Asher, J. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. McCoy et al
as 2:2023cv00705
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
K. McCoy, Tanya Asher, J. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hobson v. AWP Currier, et al
as 2:2022cv02088
Plaintiff:
Tony Hobson
Defendant:
AWP Currier, Cosgt Kelly, Cosgt Groover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rexroad v. Nevin et al
as 2:2017cv01629
Defendant:
Faliszek, K Groover, Sergeant Joseph and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Rexroad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tagle v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2016cv00852
Defendant:
Bean
Respondent:
Calderwood, Day, Groover and others
Petitioner:
Victor Tagle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farvela v. Barth et al
as 2:2016cv00831
Defendant:
Jay Barth, Kyle Groover, Jerry Howell and others
Plaintiff:
Saul Farvela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredrickson v. High Desert State Prison et al
as 2:2016cv00451
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Fredrickson
Defendant:
Groover and High Desert State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tagle v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2015cv00216
Defendant:
Mr. M. Anderson, Guard Lt. Bean, Ms. Calderwood and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Tagle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mescall v. University Medical Center et al
as 2:2012cv00927
Defendant:
Esq. Danae Adams, Franklin Akioyame, Ralph Aquino and others
Plaintiff:
Randall Mescall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
