Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Singh v. Garland
as 23-7086
Petitioner:
GURWINDER SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Holick v. Cellular Sales of New York, LL
as 21-948
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Steven Moffitt, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, William Burrell, Jan P. Holick, Jr., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Cellular Sales of Knoxville, Inc. and Cellular Sales of New York, LLC
Singh v. Garland
as 21-6176
Petitioner:
GURWINDER SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Holick v. Cellular Sales of New York, LL
as 20-2212
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Steven Moffitt, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Timothy M. Pratt, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,, William Burrell, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Cellular Sales of Knoxville, Inc. and Cellular Sales of New York, LLC
Holick v. Cellular Sales of New York, LL
as 20-2037
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gurwinder Singh, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Jason Mack, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Jan P. Holick, Jr., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Cellular Sales of New York, LLC and Cellular Sales of Knoxville, Inc.
Holick v. Cellular Sales of New York, LL
as 19-1397
Petitioner:
Jason Mack, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Jan P. Holick, Jr., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Justin Moffitt, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Respondent:
Cellular Sales of Knoxville, Inc. and Cellular Sales of New York, LLC
Singh v. Session
as 17-3214
Petitioner:
Gurwinder Singh
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
