Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Rune Kraft v. USDC-CALA
as 21-71230
Not Classified By Court:
In re: RUNE KRAFT, CALPORTLAND CONSTRUCTION, CALPORTLAND COMPANY and others
Petitioner:
RUNE KRAFT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Rune Kraft, et al v. CalPortland Construction, et al
as 21-55026
Defendant / Appellee:
CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS PACIFIC LLC, CEMEX S.A.B. DE C.V., TAIHEIYO CEMENT CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUNE KRAFT, Relator; ex rel. United States of America; ex rel. State of California
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rune Kraft v. CalPortland Construction, et al
as 18-55594
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUNE KRAFT, Realtor; ex rel. United States of America; ex rel. State of California
Defendant - Appellee:
CALPORTLAND CONSTRUCTION, CALPORTLAND COMPANY, CEMEX, INC. and others
The United States of America et al v. CalPortland Construction et al
as 2:2016cv04479
Defendant:
CalPortland Company, CalPortland Construction, Cemex Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Rune Kraft, The State of California and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Hanson Aggregates Mid-Pacific, Inc. v. Kudsk Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01520
Defendant:
Kudsk Construction, Inc., Larry Kudsk and Western National Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Hanson Aggregates Mid-Pacific, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Baykeeper v. Hanson Aggregates Mid-Pacific, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01722
Plaintiff:
Baykeeper
Defendant:
Hanson Aggregates Mid-Pacific, Inc. and Hanson Aggregates LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Hanson Aggregates Mid-Pacific, Inc. v. Pioneer et al
as 3:2007cv03849
Plaintiff:
Hanson Aggregates Mid-Pacific, Inc., Hanson Aggregates Mid-Pacific, Inc. and Hanson Aggregates Mid-Pacific, Inc.
Defendant:
Pioneer, Marbulk Canada Inc., Marbulk Shipping Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
