Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Long v. Harper et al
as 1:2023cv01084
Plaintiff:
Nicole Long
Defendant:
Lisa Harper, Elizabeth Munoz, Stefan L. Kaluzny and others
Nominal Defendant:
Torrid Holdings Inc.
Morgado v. Harper et al
as 1:2023cv00996
Plaintiff:
Allegra Morgado
Defendant:
Lisa Harper, Elizabeth Munoz, Stefan L. Kaluzny and others
Nominal Defendant:
Torrid Holdings Inc.
Ard et al v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01093
Plaintiff:
Willie Ard, Oswald Arellano, Kimberly Barnett and others
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC, Pfizer Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Greenier et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00806
Plaintiff:
William Greenier, Sherry Grice, Floyd Grier and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Hanus et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00771
Plaintiff:
Melissa Hanus, Brittany Harper, Glen Kennedy and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Gregory et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00763
Plaintiff:
Steven Gregory, Tammy Gregory, Shannon Gregory, II and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Kent v. Lydall, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01243
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Lydall, Inc., David G. Bills, James J. Cannon and others
Cohen v. Lydall, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01204
Plaintiff:
Robert Cohen
Defendant:
Lydall, Inc., David G. Bills, James J. Cannon and others
Harper v. Kriss Contracting, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00081
Defendant:
Veronica Kriss, Kathleen A. Kriss and Kriss Contracting, Inc.
Plaintiff:
William Harper
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Walker v. Marshall
as 1:2018cv01082
Plaintiff:
William Harper Walker
Defendant:
Geraldine M. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
