Cases 1 - 8 of 8
JOHNSON et al v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 3:2022cv06553
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY JOHNSON and ALBERT JOHNSON
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., HD DEVELOPMENT OF MARYLAND, INC., JOHN DOE 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
PALUSZEK et al v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
LORI PALUSZEK and ROBERT PALUSZEK
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., HD DEVELOPMENT OF MARYLAND, INC., JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
SANCHEZ-O'HARA et al v. HOME DEPOT, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv12581
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT, INC., JOHN DOES, HD DEV. OF MARYLAND, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ALISON SANCHEZ-O'HARA and ROBERT O'HARA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
DAVIS-DECICCO v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A. INC. et al
as 3:2020cv02907
Plaintiff:
Davis-DeCicco and Ellen Davis-DeCicco
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A. INC, HD DEVELOPMENT OF MARYLAND INC., HOME DEPOT U.S.A. INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
BARTON v. HOME DEPOT et al
as 3:2019cv13973
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT, XYZ CORPORATION 1-5, ABC MAINTENANCE 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BARTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
MANGINI v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. et al
as 3:2017cv01443
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A. MANGINI
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. , HD DEVELOPEMENT OF MARYLAND, INC. , JOHN DOE 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
TATAR et al v. HD DEVELOPMENT OF MARYLAND, INC. et al
as 3:2015cv05622
Plaintiff:
CAROLE TATAR and CHARLES TATAR
Defendant:
HD DEVELOPMENT OF MARYLAND, INC. , HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. , JOHN DOES 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CORTER v. BJ'S WHOLESALE CLUB, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv07320
Plaintiff:
CONSTANCE CORTER
Defendant:
BJ'S WHOLESALE CLUB, INC. , CRESSKILL HILLS, LLC , HD DEVELOPMENT OF MARYLAND, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
