Cases 1 - 10 of 16
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2008cv00312
Special Master:
Ronald J. Hedges
Plaintiff:
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, The Commisisoner of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, The Administrator of the New Jersey Spill Compensation Fund and others
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corp., Rosemore Inc., Getty Properties Corp. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Harbans Singh, Gurmail Singh and John and Jane Does Nos. 1-100
Not Classified By Court:
Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
H.P. Delta, Inc.
Cross Claimant:
Robert Melecci and Dhandi Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
City of Lowell Massachusetts v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2005cv04018
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corp, doing business as Exxon Mobile Refining and Supply Company doing business as Exxon Chemical USA doing business as ExxonMobil Chemical Corporation formerly known as Exxon Corporation, Atlantic Richfield Company individually also known as Arco formerly known as Arco Petroleum Company doing business as Arco Products Company, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. individually formerly known as Gulf Oil Corporation doing business as Chevron Products Company doing business as Chevron Chemical Company and others
Special Master:
Ronald J. Hedges
Plaintiff:
City of Lowell Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
City of Sioux City, Iowa v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2004cv01723
Defendant:
Atlantic Richfield Company ,individualy and doing business as ARCO products Company (f/k/a Arco Petroleum Co.), and also known as ARCO, BP Amoco Chemical Co., Chevron Texaco Corp. ,individualy and formerly known as Gulf Oil Corporation (d/b/a Chevron Products Company, d/b/a Chevron Chemical Company) and others
Special Master:
Ronald J. Hedges
Plaintiff:
City of Sioux City, Iowa, Galva City of, Ida Grove City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
The City of New York v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2004cv03417
Defendant:
El Paso CGP Company doing business as Coastal Oil New York, Inc. formerly known as Coastal Corporation, TRMI Holdings Inc., Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Water Finance Agency, The Water Board and The City of New York
Petitioner:
Gary Stumpf, Thomas M Milton, Meena Nainan and others
Material Witne:
Barker Hamill
Special Master:
Ronald J. Hedges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Gowanus Industrial Park, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2010cv05522
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corp.
Plaintiff:
Gowanus Industrial Park, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Gowanus Industrial Park, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2010cv07985
Plaintiff:
Gowanus Industrial Park, Inc.
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ville De Port, Inc. v. Hess Corp.
as 1:2009cv04240
Plaintiff:
Ville De Port, Inc.
Defendant:
Hess Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Vacca et al v. Amerada Hess Corp. et al
as 2:2009cv02425
Plaintiff:
John Vacca, John Vacca, David Perez and others
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corp., Richard Roth and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Flores v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2007cv04045
Plaintiff:
Efrain Flores, Jr.
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Guardsman Elevator Company, Inc. v. Riverdale Towers Housing Development Fund Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv03812
Plaintiff:
Guardsman Elevator Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Riverdale Towers Housing Development Fund Co., Inc., Department of Housing Preservation and Development of the City of New York, Amerada Hess Corp Environmental Control Board of the City of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
