Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Kaplan v. Hezbollah
as 20-1053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nechama Kumer, Noa Ardstein, Arye Leib Kaplan and others
Defendant:
Democratic People's Republic of Korea, AKA North Korea
Defendant / Appellee:
Hezbollah, AKA Hizbullah, AKA Hizbollah, AKA Hezballah, AKA Hizballah
Kaplan v. Hezbollah
as 1:2019cv03187
Defendant:
Hezbollah, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Hezballah and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah Chana Katzmacher, Danielle Sauter, Rivka Kaplan and others
Special Master:
Alan Lee Balaran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Chaim Kaplan, et al v. Hezbollah, et al
as 16-7122
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Chaim Kaplan, Rivka Kaplan, Arye Leib Kaplan and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Hezbollah, also known as Hizbullah, also known as Hizbollah, also known as Hezballah, also known as Hizballah and Democratic People's Republic of Korea, also known as North Korea
Special Master - Appellee:
Alan L. Balaran
Alann Steen v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 08-5173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alann B. Steen and Virginia Steen
Defendant - Appellee:
Islamic Republic of Iran, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Iranian Ministry of Information and Security, Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and others
Interested Party - Appellee:
United States of America
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
The Field Museum, The Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, The Oriental Institute and others
Donna Holland v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 08-7063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donna Marie Holland, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Robert S. Holland, deceased, Charles Holland, Rosemary Holland and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Islamic Republic of Iran, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Iranian Ministry of Information and Security, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, also known as The Pasdaran and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
The Field Museum, The Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, The Oriental Institute and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
